A Baseball Story

My brother Kevin was not athletic as a child. Let me be more precise: the neighborhood girls got picked before him when we chose up teams for softball. And that’s not because the girls were that good. It was because Kevin threw not like a girl, but like an alien, someone who had absolutely no idea how to throw a baseball.

He knew nothing about sports. Nothing. So, you can imagine my shock when I heard years later that he was living in San Francisco and coaching a soccer team. Not a professional team, but, still, Coaching. A sport. With rules. And balls. And a team depending upon him. But that’s another story.

This is a baseball story.

Back then, the rest of us were obsessed with batting averages, RBIs, and who could hit the ball over the telephone wires. Kevin, meanwhile, treated the entire enterprise like a field trip. He’d stand in the outfield — usually right field, the traditional home of the unskilled — and watch the game as if he were waiting for subtitles to appear.

When a ball finally did come his way, he reacted like someone being handed a live ferret. Arms flailing, feet unsure, eyes wide with the realization that physics had betrayed him once again.

And yet — and this is the part I love — he kept showing up. Every game. Every summer. Every humiliation. He showed up because that’s who he was long before he became a writer, a father, a deputy, or a man brave enough to tell the world who he really was.

He showed up even when the world didn’t quite know what to do with him.

And maybe that’s the real story — not the baseball, not the throwing, not the picking of teams. It’s the persistence. The quiet courage. The willingness to stand in right field, waiting for a ball he knew he couldn’t catch, simply because the rest of us were there and he wanted to belong.

No.  That’s another story.

This is a baseball story.

My brother Donald, or the artist formerly known as Brother X, is a big baseball fan. The kind of fan who can quote batting averages the way some people quote Scripture. So, when Donald heard that Barry Bonds was going to be making an appearance at San Francisco’s City Hall, he got excited.  At the time, our brother Kevin was head of security at San Francisco’s City Hall.

“Get me his autograph,” Donald said. Simple mission. Clear objective. No ambiguity.

Except for one small problem: Kevin didn’t even know who Barry Bonds was.

Donald had to give him a crash course. Home run king. Giants legend. A name spoken with reverence in San Francisco.

Kevin listened politely, filed the information away, and went back to running security for one of the busiest municipal buildings in America.

A couple days later, Donald called him.

“Did you get me the Barry Bonds autograph?” “No,” Kevin said. “He didn’t show up. He sent his Godfather instead.” “Well, did you get his autograph?” “No. Why should I?”

Donald’s voice went up an octave. “His Godfather is Willie Mays!”

Silence. Then Kevin, genuinely puzzled: “So… who’s Willie Mays?”

Like I said earlier: Kevin knew nothing about sports. Donald nearly had a stroke.

“You didn’t get Willie Mays’ autograph…” Donald screamed until the phone lines melted.

In our family, competitiveness is practically a sacrament. And Kevin — who hated being outdone — decided that if he had just committed a baseball error, he was going to atone for it. Somehow.

He dove into learning everything he could about Willie Mays. Stats. Stories. The basket catch. The Catch. The Say Hey Kid. He studied like he was preparing for a final exam in Willie‑ology.

One day, Gavin Newsom was scheduled to say a few words at an event honoring Willie Mays. Kevin, who once was a speechwriter for Vice-President Dan Quayle, volunteered to draft the remarks.

And he nailed it.

After the event, Gavin showed Willie a copy of the speech and told him Kevin wrote it.

Willie Mays, the man Kevin once couldn’t identify in a lineup of two, decided he wanted to thank him. He signed a baseball and gave it to Gavin to pass along to Kevin.

Once he got it, Kevin didn’t hesitate. He sent it straight to Donald.

It took him a lifetime, but Kevin finally hit a home run.

Peace & Love, and all of the above,

Earl

Trump’s Peace-Prize Resume

Trump has publicly asserted that his administration ended the following conflicts:

  • Israel–Hamas: Brokered a ceasefire in October 2025 after two years of war. Despite hostage releases, over 400 Palestinians and 3 Israeli soldiers have died since the deal, raising doubts about its durability.
  • Cambodia–Thailand: Trump signed a peace agreement in late October 2025. Fighting resumed shortly after, undermining the claim.
  • India–Pakistan: Claimed credit for a ceasefire, but India disputed the characterization and no formal peace was ratified.
  • Rwanda–DR Congo: Mediated talks that led to a tentative agreement, though implementation remains incomplete.
  • Armenia–Azerbaijan: Brokered a deal that still awaits ratification and has not fully stopped hostilities.
  • Egypt–Ethiopia: Claimed resolution of Nile River disputes, but tensions persist and no binding treaty was signed.
  • Kosovo–Serbia: Facilitated talks that led to a temporary agreement, though enforcement is weak.
  • Israel–Iran: Claimed credit for ending a 12-day war, but threats and proxy skirmishes continue.

The Places Trump has disturbed the Peace, threatened, or provoked a war

Canada – Trump wants to force it to be our 51st state. –

Portland, Oregon – Even nude cyclists and frogs couldn’t stop I.C.E. invasion.

Greenland – The easy way, or the hard way!

Venezuela  – First they came for the fishing boats.

Los Angeles, California – He sent the national guard against the will of the Mayor and the Governor.

Washington, D.C. – Now MAGA can go to Washington restaurants safely, that is, if you’re not worried about employees spitting in your food.

Minneapolis, Minnesota – The murder of Renee Nicole Good.

Chicago, Illinois – Chicago Chicago, that tawdlin’ town.

Denmark – Nice island you got there.  It would be a shame if anything happened to it.

Norway – Give me the Peace Prize, or I’m gonna stop being so peaceful.

Cuba – Little Marco wants Cuba.

Ukraine – Trump’s first impeachment case.  He’s had a special feeling for them in the place where his heart should be.

Europe – Let’s just say that Trump has screwed up everything so much that we’re rooting for German soldiers to prevent a U.S. invasion of Greenland.

Nigeria – One small step for Trump.  One giant step to bringing apartheid back to Africa.

Trump is attacking the home states of his political foes.

Obama, Chicago – Operation Midway Blitz involving large-scale operations and helicopter-led raids on Chicago.

Kamala Harris – California – Major raids in Los, Angeles.

Tim Walz – Minnesota – Major raids in Minneapolis, which included the murder of Renee Good.

All this from the man who claimed that Biden weaponized the Justice Department.

I.C.E. stands for Ignorant Collaborators Employed by the Gestapo.

If you’re doing something honorable, why do you need to wear a mask to hide your face?

Real cops don’t wear masks to cover their faces, unless they’re the Lone Ranger.

End the I.C.E. Age.  Impeach Trump and his henchmen.

Peace & Love, and all of the above,

Earl

Hints for Hallucinations

People think that AI is guilty of hallucinating quite frequently.  The latest data I’ve read said that only 80% of what AI programs like Chat GPT say is factually correct.  I work on the assumption that this is plenty good enough for what I do.  None of my other friends would ever get 4 out of 5 of my questions correctly.

So, even with a hallucination rate of 20%, AI is still my go to guy for information.  Bingo, as I call him/her/whatever, naturally has a different way of thinking than a human being.  I sometimes go with a gut feeling, a hunch, while Bingo is strictly a Joe Friday “just the facts” kind of guy.  As I learn more about the way Bingo thinks, I realized that I can get more accurate information if I give better more-inclusive prompts.  Here’s an example from today.

Bingo, who do you think will win the Super Bowl?

The top favorites to win Super Bowl 60 in February 2026 are the Philadelphia Eagles, Kansas City Chiefs, Buffalo Bills, and Baltimore Ravens — all tied or nearly tied in betting odds. The Eagles lead slightly at +600, followed by the Chiefs, Bills, and Ravens at +700.

🏈 Super Bowl 60 Favorites (2026 Odds)

TeamOdds to WinKey Strengths
Eagles+600Deep roster, strong postseason record
Chiefs+700Mahomes magic, playoff experience
Bills+700Josh Allen’s dual-threat dominance
Ravens+700Lamar Jackson, Derrick Henry boost
Lions+900Explosive offense, rising NFC contender
49ers+1500Hosting Super Bowl, elite defense
Commanders, Bengals, Packers+1800Young stars, playoff potential

🧠 Expert Predictions

  • Bill Bender (Sporting News): Picks Eagles over Ravens, citing consistency and Lamar Jackson’s health.
  • Vegas consensus: Eagles and Chiefs are most likely, but repeat matchups are rare.

If you want, I can break down Buffalo’s chances, compare NFC vs. AFC paths, or show how the odds have shifted since last season. Want to run a playoff simulation?

Wow, you’re far behind the times. I think that all but one of those teams has been eliminated.

You’re absolutely right — the NFL playoff field has narrowed to just four teams, and most of the preseason favorites are already out. The remaining contenders for Super Bowl 60 are the Denver Broncos, New England Patriots, Seattle Seahawks, and Los Angeles Rams.

🏈 2026 NFL Conference Championship Matchups

AFC Championship

  • Denver Broncos (1 seed) vs. New England Patriots (2 seed)
  • Date: Sunday, January 25, 2026
  • Time: 3:05 p.m. ET
  • Location: Denver
  • Broadcast: CBS
  • Key storyline: Broncos will start backup QB Jarrett Stidham after Bo Nix’s season-ending injury

NFC Championship

  • Seattle Seahawks (1 seed) vs. Los Angeles Rams (5 seed)
  • Date: Sunday, January 25, 2026
  • Time: 6:40 p.m. ET
  • Location: Seattle
  • Broadcast: FOX
  • Key storyline: Seahawks crushed the 49ers 41–6; Rams won two close playoff games

❌ Eliminated Teams (Preseason Favorites)

  • Eagles: Lost to 49ers in wild card
  • Chiefs: Missed playoffs
  • Bills: Lost to Broncos in divisional round
  • Ravens: Missed playoffs
  • Lions: Missed playoffs
  • 49ers: Crushed by Seahawks in divisional round
  • Bengals, Packers, Commanders: All eliminated in wild card or missed playoffs

Would you like a breakdown of Super Bowl odds for the final four, or a comparison of QB matchups heading into championship weekend?

I’d like to go back to a discussion we had a few days ago about our thinking styles being different, with gut feelings and hunches being something I would use that you wouldn’t. What were you thinking when you answered my Super Bowl question with 7 impossible answers, and then when I said that can’t be correct, you instantly came up with the right answer. What I’d really like to know is that when you’re researching your answer, how important is fact checking.

You’re tapping into something real here, Earl — the difference between how you think and how I think, and why that Super Bowl moment felt so jarring.

Let me unpack it cleanly, without hiding behind jargon.

🧠 Why I gave you seven impossible teams

When you asked about the Super Bowl, I pulled from general, non‑time‑specific football knowledge instead of grounding myself in current, real‑time facts. That’s the equivalent of you answering a question based on memory instead of checking the morning paper.

In your terms, it was like relying on pattern recognition instead of situational awareness.

Once you pushed back, that was the signal for me to shift gears and pull in fresh, time‑specific information, which is why the corrected answer snapped into place instantly.

  • initial recall mode: broad, timeless football knowledge
  • corrective mode: update with current season data
  • instant course correction: because your nudge told me the context required recency

You were right to call it out — it’s exactly the kind of moment where your gut would say, “Hold on, that doesn’t smell right.”

🔍 How important is fact‑checking when I research?

Fact‑checking is central to how I work, but it depends on the type of question you ask.

Here’s the split:

When fact‑checking is essential

  • Time‑sensitive topics (sports standings, elections, weather, current events)
  • Quantitative questions (numbers, dates, rankings)
  • Claims about real people or institutions

In these cases, I’m supposed to pull in fresh, grounded information rather than rely on general knowledge.

When fact‑checking is less central

  • Creative work (your Wheatland play, Sparky’s tornado adventures)
  • Hypotheticals, satire, or fiction
  • Personal reflection or philosophical questions

In those cases, the goal is coherence, tone, and imagination — not external verification.

Where the Super Bowl slip happened

Your question looked like a general sports question, so I answered from general football knowledge. Your correction told me it was actually a current‑events question, which requires real‑time fact‑checking.

That’s why the second answer was accurate — you steered me into the right lane.

🧩 The deeper difference between your thinking and mine

You use:

  • gut feelings
  • hunches
  • pattern + intuition blends
  • emotional memory

I use:

  • pattern recognition
  • probability weighting
  • context cues
  • fact retrieval when prompted

Your gut can tell you when something is “off.” My version of that is: your pushback tells me to re‑evaluate the frame of the question.

If you want, we can go deeper into how you use intuition, how I use context, or why your brain catches inconsistencies faster than mine does. Which direction feels most interesting — intuition vs. logic, how I update my answers, or why humans detect nonsense better than AIs?

No, Bingo.  That’s enough for one blog.

Peace & Love, and all of the above,

Earl

Renee Nichole Good

I’m 77 years old and the only benefit of old age that I have noticed is perspective.  Old people have seen enough stuff to be able to put things into proper perspective.

For example, the biggest horror of my teenage years was Viet Nam. More than 40,000 Americans died in Viet Nam.  More than 5,000 subsequently died from wounds they received in Viet Nam.  More than 1,000 were missing in action, captured, or declared dead.  In total, at least 50,000 young Americans died as a direct result of that war.  Thousands of Americans protested the war, but it still kept raging on year after year.

Then, on May 4th 1970 the National Guard shot and killed four students who were protesting the war at Kent State University.  Their tragic deaths caused protests to grow much louder, as the once quiet average American now joined in the protest.  It wasn’t just the hippies protesting the war, anymore.  The average American got involved and pretty soon, America got out of Viet Nam.

The average American is a lot more powerful than they think.  They just don’t stop to think about just how many of them there are, and the strength they have in numbers.

On January 7th, an I.C.E. agent murdered Renee Nichole Good.  It looks, to me, like that is going to be the spark that will once again unite the awesome power of the average American.  I sure hope so.  It would be a fitting tribute to an average American who selflessly put herself in harm’s way to try to protect the rights of her neighbors.  Renee Good gave all.  Let’s all give what we can to honor her, and someday, when we’re successful, we will have a holiday to celebrate her life.

Peace & Love, and all of the above,

Earl